Comments on: The Real Reason Rove Can’t Testify Under Oath: Bible Burns

By: nutroot

nutroot — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 07:18:06 +0000

I totally agree with Rachel Villegas. Rovenator isn’t evil, only programmed to improperly prioritize Republican American dogma over ethics and fate of humanity in general. See the 24th chapter. Please provide any response by answering this poll: “Rove is evil”, “Rove is unethical”, “Deny Rove is bad because I hate minorities and other gay types”, “Do not understand why people don’t like being ruled by Rove”, “If you are creeped out by Rove you must be a nut_____” (Select one: “nutcase”, “nutbag”, “nutball”, “nutroot”, “why isn’t there a choice for “moon____”? (Select one: “moonbat”, “moonnut”, “moonfruit”, “moonpod”, “[insert your own moon or nut themed aspersion]“)). Funny stuff Mr. Bobrow, thank you.

By: RACHEL VILLEGAS

RACHEL VILLEGAS — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:06:31 +0000

did you over the 24th chapter the day time or just in mind or a dream

By: Matthew Ellard

Matthew Ellard — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 05:46:18 +0000

It would seem that the methodology that Karl Rove promoted, for American conservatives to attack liberals (as a form of patriotism)is no longer working. I lean to the left but I understand it is important to have good arguments coming from the left and right. Karl Rove eliminated the interlectual arguments of the Republicans. A good citizen, left or right would agree that this is a bad thing. Good policy can come from either side.

Australia and England are now leaving the US alliance because the last seven years have been a disaster supporting American policy. Bush is giving 22billion in weapon systems to Israel, Egypt & the Saudi Kingdom. The UK & Australia joined 7 years ago to hunt and remove weapons from Iraq (not shove more weapons into the middle east)

PS You can only be an “Allies” if you fight on the same team as England. In the American war of independence America belonged to Napoleon’s “Axis”. If England, the EEC and Russia boycot the USA over emissions then American will be part of the Axis again!

By: Rob Hruska

Rob Hruska — Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:06:06 +0000

Heya Andy,

I loved this short!

But what about Rove justifies implicating him as an evil person? I’ve never understood this fascination that democrats have with Rove. If you’ve got a problem with Bush, then go after Bush. Why focus on Rove?

Anyway, in order for humor to work, as I’m sure you know, it has to have a grain of truth. I don’t see the grain here. What about Rove constitutes “evil”? Please enlighten me.

By: Andy Bobrow

Andy Bobrow — Sun, 03 Jun 2007 04:20:46 +0000

Actually it sounds like you’re the one crying here. As in, “Boo hoo, why are you mean liberals picking on my brave brave daddy? Don’t you know how super important he is?”

And as for “Congress is to Advise and Consent,” are you suggesting that the Clinton impeachment hearing was unconstitutional? Or the Watergate hearings?

By: Keith West

Keith West — Sat, 02 Jun 2007 03:17:30 +0000

My little sister used to cry when confronted with green beans at supper. She was a piker compared to you quizling lefties, spilling your emotional trauma over things you know nothing about. It is easy to judge the actions of a busy person who is making difficult decisions on the bow wave of the moment. That is what Presidents do, and the Congress is to “Advise and Consent”. I, also, was a political idiot in my youth, but exposure to the political process has softened my left edge. Study hard to find something wrong, and you will be gratified by discovery of a lot garbage, with which you will be able to build another empty case.

By: Dr. Noble H. Price

Dr. Noble H. Price — Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:19:49 +0000

Mr. Well Played,
I know surprisingly little about Mr. Karl Rove. I know nothing about his background or lineage. I do not know where Rove was educated or what he has done besides break down traditional values. Nevertheless, I can tell you all that you need to know about him. Here’s a quick review: The only weapons he has in his intellectual arsenal are book burning, brainwashing, and intimidation. That’s all he has, and heend subroutine{null pointer error}…..reboot/././././././././/nsa.priority.1(gold)…1.01.045.001//./././././.reset defaults…010110110001100111010110/////boot failure……real time clock error…….mandatory shut-down/./././deleting…\Bobrow\ Andrew\ Morton\…/./././././sanitizing FAT…………breaking link

By: The Hairy Beast

The Hairy Beast — Tue, 03 Apr 2007 21:07:34 +0000

Au contraire – he’s definitely not one of ours.

This nut’s fallen from your tree, hehe.

By: Andy Bobrow

Andy Bobrow — Tue, 03 Apr 2007 04:33:47 +0000

Dr. Price:

At first, I thought you were insane or drunk, but now I think I know what you are. You are some kind of spam-bot created by conservative operatives (probably Rove, I figure), which randomly posts liberal-sounding gibberish in a fiendish attempt to dilute any other liberal arguments. Well I’m onto you, Rove. Well played.

By: Dr. Noble H. Price

Dr. Noble H. Price — Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:11:00 +0000

Mr. Chuckle,
I have never aspired to become a speechwriter, politician, or mainstream political columnist. Nevertheless, if you can look beyond my pitiable writing style you’ll surely see that I have something important to tell you about Mr.The Hairy Beast (THB for the sake of brevity). To plunge right into it, THB frequently avers his support of democracy and his love of freedom. But one need only look at what THB is doing — as opposed to what he is saying — to understand his true aims. He says that he is known for his sound judgment, unerring foresight, and sagacious adaptation of means to ends. Should we care that large numbers of pathetic, venom-spouting blatherskites actually believe such blockish things? Should we try to convince them otherwise? I don’t think so. In fact, I’d go so far as to say that his paroxysms manifest themselves in two phases. Phase one: construct the spectre of a terrible armed threat. Phase two: do the entire country a grave disservice.

MTHB once heard a mutinous paranoiac say, “Truth is merely a social construct.” What’s amazing is that THB was then able to use that single quotation plus some anecdotal evidence to convince his dupes that clever one-liners are a valid substitute for actual thinking, which undoubtedly makes me wonder, “What is his secret agenda?” My best guess, for what it may be worth, is based on two key observations. The first observation is that I must search for solutions that are more creative and constructive than the typically namby-pamby ones championed by what I call petty, hectoring fogeys if we are fully to appreciate the entire menace represented by cacodemonic perverts (especially the stinking type). The second, more telling, observation is that The Hairy Beast’s attempts to promote a form of government in which religious freedom, racial equality, and individual liberty are severely at risk are much worse than mere scapegoatism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation.